Murder was a daily event, with bandits and vigilantes periodically dominating the scene. In one generation Americans and European immigrants replaced Mexicans in city government.. Nov 14, 2019 · Los Angeles' Rich Farming History Explained. When you think of Los Angeles, you don't think of it as a farm town. However, at one point, it was the Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities, privately owned vehicles should be banned in city centers, while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. In 2011, some scientists reached a simple but startling conclusion: Adding roads does nothing to relieve traffic congestion. Their " Fundamental Law of Road Congestion " says, in short, that if you build roads, they'll fill up, and that providing public transportation as an option doesn't help reduce traffic. 18/06/2019 815 People think that traffic congestion in the downtown area is due to the increasing number of private cars. A. Traffic congestion in the downtown area is blamed for the increasing number of private cars. B. The increasing number of private cars is thought to be responsible for traffic congestion in the downtown area. C. People think that traffic congestion in the downtown area is due to the increasing number of private cars. >A. Traffic congestion in the downtown area is blamed for the increasing number of private cars. >B. The increasing number of private cars is thought to be responsible for traffic congestion in the downtown area. >C. It is commonly believed that the best way to minimize a traffic problems is by constructing more train and metro lines, while there are others who think that traffic congestion can be solved by developing better roadways. RpUkGHZ. Question 20 People think that traffic congestion in the downtown area is due to the increasing number of private cars. A. Traffic congestion in the downtown area is blamed for the increasing number of private cars. B. The increasing number of private cars is thought to be responsible for traffic congestion in the downtown area. C. The increasing number of private cars is attributed to traffic congestion in the downtown area. D. Traffic congestion in the downtown area is thought to result in the increasing number of private cars. Answer REMOVE Structure The initial sentence is the structure People think that …….. People think …. then we will change to the very simple passive. =============== Reader Interactions Traffic jams are bad for the environment, the economy and our health. Here are the worst consequences due to traffic congestion — and the places where people suffer the Getty Images/AFP/Y. Kadobnov The Essay Writing section of the IELTS Writing Module can be a difficult task for many IELTS Aspirants. Thus, it is vital that you polish your essay writing skills before attempting the IELTS. Below is a sample IELTS Essay for the IELTS Essay topic Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion. OR Some people think that governments should spend money on railways. Others believe that there should be more investment into new roads. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Band Sample Essay 1 Traffic congestion has become the bane of citizens in many parts of the world. In order to mitigate this problem, some suggest that public transportation, such as trains and subway lines should be constructed. Meanwhile, others are firm in their belief that building wider roads makes more sense. Both of these methods will be analysed below. IELTS Writing General Actual Tests eBook Combo July - October 2022 [Task 1+ Task 2] of 89 Reviews Written by professional IELTS teachers to help candidates on the big day Written by professional IELTS teachers to help candidates on the big day On the one hand, building trains is an effective method to improve traffic condition. There is compelling evidence to support investment in public transportation. In countries where subway systems are up to standard, the number of private vehicles that participate in traffic is small, and city dwellers can save hours of delay and also thousands of dollars on travel expenses. That is not to mention a significant number of gallons of fuel saved, which means slowing down the exploitation of natural resources. There are, however, others who express doubts on this approach. Their suggestion is that a better way to alleviate traffic jam is to make bigger road systems. The undeniable fact is that in many developing countries today, roads are narrow and in a desperate state of disrepair, which greatly obstructs the travels to their destinations. Someone’s small accidents, a flat tyre, for example, can bring traffic to a halt, which is a commonly-seen problem in roads that have only two lanes. To conclude, both methods discussed above provide sustained relief on our roadways; however, it is my opinion that the method to build trains and subway makes more sense in terms of environmental protection. Band Model Essay 2 The high volume of traffic is a huge problem for many big cities. Therefore, there is a widely held view among a number of people that governmental bodies should pour money in building such public transport systems as train and subway lines. Others, however, argue that road expansion is the more proper way. To my mind, though widening streets benefits us, this can not alleviate traffic congestion. It is not by chance that developing public vehicles is considered one of the common approaches to reduce traffic jams. To day, people have indeed used too many private vehicles whose disadvantages can be listed. The long line of cars at peak hours is a typical example, which may lead to lengthy delays. This can also cause other serious consequences such as traffic accidents. Accordingly, it is widely believed that building underground tunnels can solve heavy traffic jams due to empty spaces beneath the ground. However, according to others, road extension is a better alternative because this solution does not demand more efforts. Also, extending road does not seem as costly as developing underground transport systems. Another reason for this is that bigger roads will create more spaces for vehicle owners, helping them to circulate easily during peak hours. By doing so, traffic congestion can be alleviated. In my opinion, road expansion is not a long-term measure because people tend to drive their vehicles regularly on newly widened streets. In other words, traffic jams might continue to occur. Therefore, government should take other solutions into consideration for safer transportation. Bonus topics One way to solve the problem of congestion in cities is to build sky trains which run overhead rather than on or under the ground. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this solution to solve congestion? In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Also check IELTS Writing tips IELTS Writing recent actual test IELTS Writing Answer sheet IELTS map vocabulary Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problem people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburb or in the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Here is a band IELTS essay on this topic written by one of our students. Need help with IELTS writing? Get your IELTS essays, letters and reports corrected by IELTS essay sampleTraffic congestion and transport issues are a major problem in all major cities. Some argue that people who travel to the city ought to be encouraged to reside in it to avoid long delays in commuting. Personally, I strongly disagree with this notion and believe that this would substantially increase property prices and cause cities to eventually expand begin with, cities are not equipped to cope with any increase in their population. They lack the infrastructure and space. Most metros have limited size. Even if a city is capable of accommodating its current population, problems will arise when that population increases. In Mumbai, for example, people are forced to live in the suburbs, because the central area of the city is too small to accommodate all of them. As a result, despite people wanting to live in the city, it is not practically possible for them. These suburbanites, then, have to travel to the city each morning to reach their since property prices in cities are already high, few people will be able to afford them and this will force them to move to suburbs. Actually, moving to suburbs and living in the countryside is not much different. In either case, people have to travel. Now if people manage to move to downtown, it will still not resolve the traffic issue. It will actually make it worse. Unless everyone can walk to work, any increase in the population of metros will only worsen traffic problems. Eventually, it would take hours for even a 10 minute’s commute. Therefore, these cities have to spread horizontally and people have to commute to the city for work or recreational purposes leading to traffic conclusion, while encouraging people to reside in cities seems like an easy solution to avoid traffic and public transport issues, it is practically not possible due to high property prices in urban areas and the limited size of the cities.

people think that traffic congestion